Also, in a separate post I want to point out that Fortune article illustrates one of the huge problems I have with the modern press and its political leanings - in either direction. They like to create links between things that don't exist for the sole reason of scaring people into one alignment or another. Like the implication that if you want EV's to exist, you'd better youtube-like "Like and Subscribe" this particular political party, or EV's will be gone (mind you, some politicians make that implication easy by behaving like clowns publicly, but I digress...).
I think that's in large part of what helps shrink their subscribed base of readers, the need to tie things together that shouldn't be, and alienating not only readers of the opposite alignment, but also readers like me who don't care about alignment, and are just sick of the two sides sniping at each other over something that's really none of their concern and they shouldn't have any power over.